 |
|
Accounting professionals and the
Accounting Education Change Commission agree that
communication skills are an essential ingredient for
successful accounting careers. Communication skills take many
forms, including writing skills and the ability to express
ideas clearly and persuasively in one-on-one situations. This
semester, however, we shall be focusing on two important
aspects of communication skills: the ability to operate
effectively as part of a team, and formal presentations.
Working
on class activities in groups should ultimately lead to better
solutions being produced (many heads being better than one),
to larger problems and issues being tackled than individuals
alone could be expected to address given class time
constraints (assuming an appropriate division of labor), and
to opportunities to play to the strengths of individuals
rather than their weaknesses (the hallmark of effective
executives). These benefits obviously emulate those
anticipated from teamwork in the workplace. In addition,
however, working in groups has been found to be an effective
learning vehicle. We will therefore work in groups in order to
gain the learning advantages; additionally, we will actively
study the processes of working in groups, in order to learn to
become better team players.
|

|
GROUPS
|
Group activities are a central
feature of human social and work behavior. Membership in
groups, temporary and permanent, large and small, is
characteristic of most of life’s experiences. In recent
times, group processes and the development of skills to manage
and participate in them have assumed new importance. There are
many different kinds of groups. Meetings and committees are
examples of short-lived information-exchanging groups. In the
workplace, groups large and small exist to perform tasks. In
smaller work teams, work satisfaction may be high, and
participation in the group may be attractive to members. One
problem with such groups is that they may be resistant to
changes in work practices. In management, research and
learning environments, problem-solving and creative groups may
be used. At work and elsewhere, informal groupings may be
created. We are primarily interested in problem-solving
groups.
A group
may be said to exist as more than a mere collection of people
when it possesses:
|
| |
collective perception
|
| |
needs
|
| |
shared aims
|
| |
interdependence
|
| |
social organization
|
| |
interaction
|
| |
cohesiveness
|
| |
membership.
|

|
Groups need to regulate their
boundaries; i.e., to manage their relationships with other
groups. They need to maintain and develop their required
inputs (e.g., information, new members) and outputs (e.g.,
products, services, solutions to problems). They also need to
control their activities and to integrate them. In successful
problem-solving groups we expect to find a high degree of
integration of activities in conjunction with permissive,
non-directive, control.
Research into group behavior suggests that the following group
properties may be of interest:
|
| |
background
|
| |
participation pattern
|
| |
communication
|
| |
cohesion
|
| |
atmosphere
|
| |
norms
|
| |
sociometric pattern
|
| |
structure and organization
|
| |
procedures
|
| |
goals.
|

|
GROUP
DEVELOPMENT
|
In the work situation, as in the
classroom environment, groups are not normally created on the
basis of personal choice or democracy. Many factors including
task requirements, skills, time constraints, economic and
political forces, influence the formation of problem-solving
groups. The individuals assigned to work in a group face the
challenge of learning to work successfully together as a team.
Many researchers have studied the different phases of group
development. One such analysis (Tuckman and Jensen 1977)
suggests that groups pass through the following five stages,
which help shape subsequent group character:
|
| |
FORMING |
characterized by silences, anxiety, dependence
on a leader, concern for structure, task requirements and
methods
|
| |
STORMING |
noisy, searching and comparing ideas, emotional
resistance to task demands, more self-oriented independent
behaviors, possible rebellion against the initial leader,
creation of sub-groups, information generation, opinion
seeking, and development of early pairings and relationships
|
| |
NORMING |
re-emergence of task demands, more open
exchange of ideas and views, more listening and co-operation,
rules of conduct, group identity, group cohesion, individual
roles and decision-making processes
|
| |
PERFORMING |
settled interdependence and problem solving,
energy directed at task requirements
|
| |
ADJOURNING |
when the task is completed.
|

|
GROUP
PROCESSES
|
Researchers have argued that the
higher the quality of interdependence required (i.e, in groups
such as problem-solving groups with permissive controls and
high integration), the more necessary it is for groups to
spend time in the "storming" and "norming"
phases, and indeed to revisit them when "performing"
becomes sub-standard. Groups often rush into task performance
as a way of avoiding the anxiety associated with the newness
of their group or the diversity of individual opinions. Teams
are more likely to succeed, however, if they put aside some
group time to examine, discuss and develop their group
processes. This can be done in many ways, e.g.:
|
| |
ask individual members to say what
their feelings are towards the group and its task
|
| |
ask individuals to say what they
would like the group to do more of and less of
|
| |
ask another group to watch the
group function and provide feedback.
|

|
Perhaps the most important thing is
for group members to be aware of the operation of group
processes as group discussions progress, and to review the
effectiveness of group processes regularly. Particular
attention should be paid to:
|
| |
how ideas are generated and
evaluated
|
| |
how tasks are apportioned and
delegated
|
| |
how decisions are reached
|
| |
how conflicts are identified and
resolved.
|

|
Although successful completion of
tasks is important, attention should also be paid to morale
and the feelings of individual members towards the group, its
tasks, and other members.
Cohesive,
interdependent, high morale groups have their own potential
weaknesses, sometimes referred to as "group think".
These include:
|
| |
the illusion of invulnerability
|
| |
shared stereotypes
|
| |
rationalization
|
| |
the illusion of morality
|
| |
self-censorship
|
| |
direct pressure on individuals to
conform or agree
|
| |
the illusion of unanimity based on
silent consent
|
| |
filtering out or eliminating
threatening information.
|

|
Group processes may be examined
through such questions as:
|
| |
How does the group determine its
tasks or agenda?
|
| |
How does it make decisions?
|
| |
How does it discover and make use
of the resources of its members?
|
| |
How does it co-ordinate its various
members, sub-groups and activities?
|
| |
How does it evaluate its work?
|

|
Participation in group processes
may be classified into:
|
| |
group-building and maintenance
roles
|
| |
group task roles.
|

|
Participation is examined in more
detail in the section below.
|

|
GROUP
PARTICIPATION
|
Individual members may participate
in group discussions in a number of positive ways:
|
| |
seeking ideas through open
questions
|
| |
seeking clarification of a prior
contribution
|
| |
seeking reactions to a proposal or
suggestion
|
| |
suggesting ideas in the form of a
question
|
| |
seeking other information
|
| |
proposing ideas in the form of a
statement
|
| |
building on ideas already tabled by
further proposing, suggesting or integrating
|
| |
consensus testing
|
| |
supporting previous contributions
and being encouraging
|
| |
standard setting to help the group
achieve goals
|
| |
stating difficulties
|
| |
disagreeing or criticizing
|
| |
summarizing, clarifying, explaining
or repeating
|
| |
gatekeeping by seeing that everyone
has the opportunity to speak
|
| |
expressing group feelings
|
| |
releasing tension.
|

|
Of course, there are negative forms
of participation, too, including:
|
| |
interrupting (cutting in or
speaking over someone else)
|
| |
dominating
|
| |
manipulating
|
| |
blocking
|
| |
belittling
|
| |
distracting
|
| |
splitting
|
| |
excluding.
|

|
It is often helpful to have someone
actively monitor group discussions for a period of time and
provide feedback on the extent to which each group member is
engaging in these various participative behaviors.
|

|
EVALUATING
GROUP ACTIVITIES
|
At the conclusion of each group
session, it may be helpful to consider whether:
|
| |
members of the group have agreed
upon and understood the specific goals for the group
|
| |
members of the group have agreed
upon and understood the ground rules for the group activity
|
| |
the group has responded to the
feelings or moods expressed by its members
|
| |
the group has listened to and
responded to members’ ideas and comments and expressed
recognition of contributions
|
| |
all members of the group have been
involved and have participated in the discussion
|
| |
the atmosphere of the group has
been friendly and open, encouraging members to express
criticisms or ask questions that expose themselves
|
| |
the group has confronted any
members who were hindering the group in achieving its tasks
|
| |
the group has been able to discuss
areas of differences between members such that it has neither
avoided conflict nor allowed the discussion to become
destructive
|
| |
the group has evaluated its
progress toward its goals during and at the close of the
session
|
| |
at the end of the session the group
has decided on its specific task and work required to be done
for the next session
|
| |
the group leader (if there has been
one) encouraged discussion before presenting ideas
|
| |
the group leader has synthesized
related ideas and summarized concepts that the group has been
discussing
|
| |
the group leader has determined
whether all group members have reached agreement about a
particular point or are ready to move onto something else
|
| |
the group leader did not dominate
nor did the group defer unduly to the leader’s recognition
of contributions.
|

|
GRADING
OF GROUP ACTIVITIES
|
Group activities will be graded by
the instructor, based on the work product of the group, taking
into account peer evaluations by group members of the
performance of all member of the group. Peer evaluations will
address:
|
| |
attendance
|
| |
participation in discussions
|
| |
attitude towards the group and its
tasks
|
| |
contribution towards the group’s
workload and task performance
|
| |
compliance with the group’s own
code of conduct.
|
| |
|